Filed under AR Court Cases

“DANGEROUS DOGS” AND AR Bullsh*t re MSN

“Putting out forest fires without dealing with the fuel buildup just perpetuates the problem because you’re not treating the root cause.”   That brings ~us~  to the question of the dogs.  It would seem that canine experts know why and what can make dogs dangerous, and it is frequently the topic of debate among members … Continue reading »

Animal Rights (HSUS) extremist Agenda: NO Pets

Join the Crusade Against HSUS Whitewash+Pass It Forward!—-> What is the HSUS and friends’ agenda now? The goal of all Animal Rights extremists is to outlaw pets and use of all animals, because they believe animals are People and have human rights.  They believe keeping an animal is “slavery” which is why they don’t want people to … Continue reading »

CDOC Los Angeles PRELIM INJUNCTION (MSN)—- NOT GRANTED

The CDOC Prelim Injunction on the city of Los Angeles’ MSN ordinance,  heard today in Los Angeles Superior Court, was not granted.  That means–unless I am mistaken–that the door to door canvassing will begin now, using the AR volunteers as the ones to do the home ”canvassing.” As a dog advocate and attorney against anti pet laws, I strongly urge … Continue reading »

PITBULL SERVICE DOGS EXEMPTED FROM MSN “BSL” LAW

Join the Crusade Against HSUS+friends+Pass it Forward!—> Plaintiff Coalition of Human Advocates for K9′s and Owners (CHAKO) sued San Francisco in 2006, challenging, among other things, that the local ordinance requiring only pitbull dogs to be altered at an early age violated the federal ADA, infringing the rights of any disabled person who wanted to use a pitbull service dog.  … Continue reading »