The California Federation of Dog Clubs and the USSPCO [United States Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Others, 501(c)(3)], Pet Pac lobbyist Bill Hemby, Outdoor Heritage, SAOVA, rabbit groups, ACLU, defense attorneys, judges groups, farming and agriculture groups, and many others have all OPPOSED and registered opposition to SB917 in the past. However, the legislature … Continue reading »
Tagged with SB917 LAWSUIT …
ARs Estatic over SB917, Can’t Wait to Call Cops
This is an AR example found online, specifically referring to SB917 Submitted by Kelly at:July 27, 2011 05:25 PM YES! Now, everytime I see someone selling animals on the side of the road or in a parking lot, I can tell them it is illegal, and if they don’t leave in 5 min., I am … Continue reading »
Are YOU Guilty of “Animal Abuse” via California SB 917
ANYONE RE-HOMING ANIMALS ON CRAIGSLIST? Or any other ad? Doesn’t matter… you will be guilty. You already are guilty. Are these dogs standing on the sidewalk outside? Yes. then you would be guilty of animal abuse. If you re home, sell or even give away an animal outside, you are about to become guilty … Continue reading »
California Animal Law Case— “NO Warrant Required” Entry
California Penal Code Section 597……..Isn’t this the “abuse” section that HSUS loves to keep adding to, every year? Let’s pretend a “neighbor” that doesn’t like YOUR dogs, calls the police and claims that you had dog shrieks coming from YOUR home, even if there were none. That then gives the police probable cause to search … Continue reading »
