Updated, orig posted 2/2010……..
Flash–see NEW Killing Chart (below first picture) by HSUS showing shelters how to SAVE-ON-KILLING and how–in killing —puppies can only take less than 2 minutes time to process!!! WOW!!! Is that a time saver or what? Isn’t that what every SHELTER in America wants/needs to know??!!
You *THINK* H$U$ (Humane Society of the United States) is about “saving” animals, and pups, pitbulls and small kittens? What a JOKE!!!! The new “save an animal now” propaganda ads on TV by HSUS —show a URL for save an animal now dot org—– they are by HSUS. TV deception…..HSUS doesn’t even use its own tarnished NAME…………………….. —->>> HSUS ” cruelty ads” should REALLY be named …
~~HSUS SWINDLES PUBLIC DONATIONS+
KILLS MORE ANIMALS…
.. BY USING STOLEN HURRICANE KATRINA $$$
TO LOBBY FOR ANIMAL RIGHTS LAWS NATIONWIDE~
HSUS publishes ADS with alleged ‘victim’ animal pictures, that have giant words like “What did I do Wrong” or Do I deserve to die? or other such nonsense. We should be asking people WHY they donate to HSUS when HSUS does the opposite of what their own marketing claims? !!
IN FACT—HSUS is about killing more animals—–>>>> not saving them.
HSUS Sav-on-killing [PDF chart] Leave it to the HSUS or Peta to publish something like this……. Deception is the goal of HSUS, and killing is their real game.
Here is the HSUS talking (below) in their published how to kill book: ‘A few shelters require that all animals who are to be euthanized must first be anesthetized.
‘Policies such as these may create safety problems and are not always in the best interest of the animal.’ Oh, HSUS forgot to put the pics in of all the dogs they helped to kill, this pic is just an example of a tiny fraction of the killing helped along by HSUS/various groups like the ASPCA and local SPCAs influenced by their PAPA killing group aka Humane Society of the United States. H$U$ claims they engage in over 5,000 RAIDS PER YEAR PEOPLE……. Killing is their method of “saving.” OR seize the animals and then sell or give away to whatever “non profit” they want. Remember, anyone else selling or giving away animals outside is guilty of “abuse” according to CA law started 1/12/2012. Oh–but wait, a few years ago they also exempted PET STORES from the law BECAUSE IN CALIFORNIA THEY ARE SO HIGHLY REGULATED!! So a highly regulated pet store can display, show, and sell or give away animals in public along with non profits.
Re: documenting the need for killing: “A false notion persists that any shelter, if committed enough, can easily place all the animals it receives.” “Provide euthanasia as soon as possible once an animal has been selected for euthanasia.” “Develop criteria that will clearly document the reasons for and NUMBERS of animals being euthanized.” <<<————————————-
“Euthanasia is more than humanely taking the life of an animal. When euthanasia by injection is performed, the technician and the handler combine knowledge, equipment, skills and compassion into humane and effective teamwork.”
WHY would ANY group allegedly “dedicated” to
take PRIDE in killing them?
———- >>>HSUS is NOT about “saving.”
HSUS takes in millions of $$$$ so
they can change the
LEGAL status of animals. <<<——-
If the legal status of animals is changed from that of PROPERTY—- then we lose our animals, our pets, our ability to own them, sell them, buy them, and use them in any form. That is the most simple way to explain what HSUS does with its animal rights LOBBYING.
If no animal was considered property, we could not raise animals for food, sell animal products for food or otherwise, and we surely could not OWN them. That would take out the pet trade, farming, any jobs associated with animals, such as groomers, zoos, pet stores, buying and selling of animals, breeding of animals, owing animals as property. That would stop fishing, hunting, medical testing, disease prevention, and so many other products from being produced, including leather items, fur clothing/hats, leather shoes, any animal products/any animal foods, eggs, liquid eggs, hamburgers, and probably millions of items [including dog/cat/pet food] containing any animal product elements.
People think this is not possible, but people are wrong. 50 years ago people did not know about the Internet, CD’s, digitalized items, and most technology that is now common.
Newspapers are becoming impossible to sustain due to lost advertising. Even the Post Office is having difficulty staying open, since email is used instead. CHANGES in society have created this— and animal rights is BASED on CHANGING the legal status of all animals.
The animal extremist terrorism that has been seen in past years have warranted prison sentences for both property destruction, and business economic destruction, as well as a host of related crimes including intimidation, food adulteration, bombs, arson, etc. AND now the AETA is being challenged via lawsuit recently filed in 2011, back East!!
Animal rights laws are cropping up everywhere—– all people interested in animals must stand united against animal rights groups and conglomerates—- if animals are to remain our property under the law.
Animal rights is designed to destroy property/legal rights of citizens.
Animal rights is purposely targeted to change the legal status of animals, and always has been targeted to do that. Each new law somehow plays a part in that proposed change.
Every legal case filed by HSUS and its conglomerates under the HSUS umbrella name has a purpose—and every purpose is simple. Build up case law to destroy the legal status of animals as property. That is the exact REASON that HSUS conglomerates jump on the bandwagon of ANIMAL ABUSE and animal “cruelty.” HSUS says animal abuse= child abuse. That abuse of animals= domestic violence.
That “selling an animal” = “animal cruelty.”
Specifically, AB1122 passed by the CA Legislature in 2009 said that very thing—that selling an animal outside amounted to animal cruelty, which is a criminal proceeding, punishable under the penal code………………If that is the case, AND selling=animal abuse, clearly it meant that selling animals is A CRIME. Yet non profits and rescues were “exempted” from abuse??? WTH??? A direct conflict with the Penal Code.
Countless “advocates” believed that AB1122 was a “good” law.
It was vetoed by Governor, yet in 2011, Gov Brown allowed SB 917 (same as AB1122) to PASS.
How very, very, very STUPID. Wake up people. Stupidity is not going to win us this battle. At this point, we are concerned that stupidity is widespread. Prove us wrong, eh?