Animal Law for Dummies– the OWNERS?

We could write books on this topic. Don’t need perfect sentences, verbiage or even spelling. Don’t need tons of intelligence, although it helps.  We will try and spell it out clearly. If you don’t want to read, just go to the last paragraph for the Obama example.

The number one reason that all owners should NOT buy into the crap that animal rights extremists hand us?  Is because essentially ARs misrepresent almost everything, AND they have a huge agenda behind it all. The agenda is marketed by using common propaganda techniques, TV, videos, and movies and books, classroom education in elementary school.

The average animal owner will NOT pay much attention and will ASSUME that is is animal welfare. IT IS NOT ANIMAL WELFARE. It is normally animal rights pretending to be animal welfare. We believe that animal welfare presumes that legally, animals are property under the law.

Animal rights does NOT believe animals are property at all.  In fact they BELIEVE animals hold about the same position as people.  This is of huge importance.  Everything they do hinges on it.

That is why they (the ARs) do not want people to OWN, BUY, SELL, TRADE or even advertise. They don’t want anyone to “make” any $$ on selling an animal, or animal related product.  The agenda is commonly known as the 12 Steps of Animals Rights done by Kim Bartlett whose husband Merritt Clifton, publishes Animal People.

The 12 Steps means no animals should be bred, the pet trade should be abolished, no selling, no buying, no breeding, no giving away, no hunting, no fishing, and any commercial use of any animals should die today. Hence, no leather, no dog food with animal products, no eggs, no steaks, no hamburgers, no chicken sandwiches, no KFC, no food with animal products, no medicine using animal products, no drugs using animal products. Stop fishing fleets, ranching, farming,hunting licenses [hunting would all be illegal], stop all zoos, animal exhibition, stop all aquariums and ability to buy a goldfish, any fish, any marine type anything, any reptile, any small mammal, birds [esp exotic ones], stop the circus (currently ARs trying to stop circus from showing animals who have traveled in past 15 days prior to show), stop rodeos, stop trained animals [eliminating trained animal in all entertainment, movies, etc]  no competition of animals in shows (because its competition and your offspring might sell for more if you win),no profit can be made on any “sales” of any animals??  ARs call that “profiteering off the backs of animals.”  Did you know that?

We admit this will not happen overnite. BUT what people don’t understand is when a bad AR law passes, it gives precedence to the animal rights law that passed. THAT is why ARs kept litigating the circus animal (elephants) case for over TEN friggin’ YEARS!!!  AND the ARs had to CHEAT to even keep the case going for over 9 YEARS– then the ARs  completely LOST the case on not 1, not 2, but 3 levels of Court.  That ONE case cost over $20,000,000 to defend.

H$U$ and other AR groups will build another law using the former law as a basis—but they first must pass a law, or win a lawsuit.  This will NEVER stop– so the only way for US to stop it, is to make people understand—bad laws give rise to worse bad laws and it goes on until we somehow manage to stop it.  It is like CANCER and should be stopped at its inception wherever possible. 

What is key, is to understand the foundation of animal rights belief  means that animals are not property.  Once laws start taking away our own rights as to our property, we have big problems.

Let’s pretend Congress passed a law that said no one can sell an animal because it’s animal abuse. BUT they said in the same law—that only NON PROFITS could sell animals. No one in the universe would agree with that law EXCEPT non profits.

Well that is exactly what California SB 917 law does.  It exempts non profits from selling, it claims selling by others which are NOT non profits is “animal abuse”…….it thus  exempts non profits from animal abuse. Can’t make it any more clear than that.  ARs have criminalized selling into animal abuse.  BUT NOT IF THEY DO IT.   [See how to inform your Congress person about H$U$–read comment below in “comments” below the picture]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OsaH0iN6UM

   W A K E   *   U P   *   P E O P LE

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Animal Law for Dummies– the OWNERS?

  1. The Human Society of the United States has passed numerous bills locally and federally as per their website. If you believe that the Humane Society of the United States has had ONE contact with your Representatives, please follow the instructions below. It’s a simple copy and paste letter to send to your Representatives. Some Senators have already contacted the Department of Justice and the IRS.
    DECEMBER CALL TO ACTION by Frank Losey
    ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE LOBBYING DISCLOSURE ACT OF 1995 BY THE HSUS
    If you believe that the Senior Leadership of the Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) has made more than one “Lobbying Contact” with Members of Congress or their respective staffs in the last five years, then there is reason to believe that the HSUS and its Senior Leadership have failed to comply with the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 because they have never registered as a lobbying organization or as lobbyists with the appropriate Congressional Offices.
    If every Member of Congress were to receive Hundreds, or possibly thousands, of E-Mails from their constituents which asks Six Pointed Questions, those E-Mails may shine a BIG BRIGHT SPOTLIGHT on the fact that the HSUS has been acting “ABOVE THE LAW” and should be held accountable.
    You will help to BRIGHTEN THAT SPOTLIGHT if you will take less than 20 Minutes to send an E-Mail to your two U.S. Senators and to your U.S. Representative and ask six pointed questions. If you wish to do so, follow the instructions set out below and use the suggested Text for your E-Mails. And yes, send E-Mails to the Members of Congress who are supporting the HSUS Legislative Agenda. LARGE NUMBERS OF E-MAILS CAN AND DO MAKE A DIFFERENCE WITH MEMBERS OF CONGRESS!!!!!! That is why the HSUS literally generates Millions of E-Mails going to Members of Congress.
    1. To send an E-Mail to your U.S. Representative, Log onto http://www.house.gov/writerep/
    2. Fill in your state and ZIP Code on the prompt that appears.
    3. Add your name, address and E-Mail address on E-Mail Form for your U.S. Representative; and on the Subject Line add: LOBBYING DISCLOSURE ACT OF 1995; and then add then add the message set out below.
    4. To send an E-Mail to your Two Senators, Log onto: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
    5. Click onto the E-Mail Address for each of your two U.S. Senators.
    6. Add your name, address and E-Mail address on E-Mail Form for your U.S. Representative; and on the Subject Line add: LOBBYING DISCLOSURE ACT OF 1995; and then add then add the message set out below.
    7. So that a running count of total E-Mails may be maintained, send a confirmation that the three E-Mails were sent from which State to Frank Losey:

    Suggested Text of E-Mail Message
    NOTE: Resist the temptation to mention your parochial “beef” with the HSUS. This “High Road” Approach is designed to, in essence, eliminate the opportunity for a “boilerplate” response to be sent back to you which merely states “Thank You for bringing your issues of concern to my attention.” Instead, the “Suggested Text” raises questions that will increase the likelihood that the Members of Congress will need to address a very, very specific violation of the Law by the HSUS, which violation is not directly related to any specific Bill in Congress. The GOAL is to raise a serious question as to the “credibility” of the HSUS. If successful, it will affect the ability of the HSUS to influence Congress. And if it results in the HSUS “registering” with Congress, this could affect its IRS “public charity” status!!!
    Dear Representative/Senator______________
    I would appreciate receiving your responses to the following Six Questions that relate to the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. This Act, as currently written, provides that a person or organization that makes more than one contact with a “Covered Executive Branch Official” or a “Covered Legislative Branch Official,” such as Members of Congress and their respective Staffs, must register as a Lobbyist or a Lobbying Organization with the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate.
    QUESTION 1: Do you believe that the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 should be strictly enforced?
    QUESTION 2: If you believe that the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 should be strictly enforced, why has neither the Clerk of the House nor the Secretary of the Senate published specific procedures that would permit concerned citizens to report apparent violations of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to an appropriate Congressional Office?
    QUESTION 3: Do you believe that a tax-exempt, public charity and its senior leadership should be required to comply with the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 and register as a lobbying organization and as lobbyists with the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate if they have more than one contact with Members of Congress or their respective staffs for the purpose of influencing legislation?
    QUESTION 4: If you believe that a tax-exempt, public charity and its senior leadership should be required to register as a lobbying organization and as lobbyists if they have had more than one contact with a Member of Congress or his or her staff for the purpose of influencing legislation, why has the Humane Society of the U. S. (HSUS) and its Senior Leadership been permitted to ignore the registration requirements of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 when they have literally made thousands of contacts with Members of Congress and their respective staffs during the last five years? For example, in March of 2011 the Humane Society of the U.S. hosted an Awards Banquet during which they honored the 146 Members of Congress who best supported the Legislative Agenda of the HSUS in 2010.
    QUESTION 5: If the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia is the Office in the Justice Department that is responsible for enforcing the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, why has Mr. Keith Morgan, the Assistant U.S. Attorney in that Office not acted on a Complaint that he received during the first week in August of 2011 – – more than four months ago – – which documented the thousands of lobbying contacts made by the Senior Leadership of Humane Society of the U.S. , and its self-described “Lobbying Arm,” the Humane Society Legislative Fund that has oversight over three PACs that have submitted over 2,300 pages of lobbying-related documents to the Federal Election Commission?
    QUESTION 6: Will you call Mr. Morgan or someone else in the Justice Department and ask why no action has been taken on the documented Complaint received by Mr. Morgan in early August of 2011 so that you and your colleagues in Congress may decide whether or not to repeal the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 or to ensure that it is strictly enforced?
    Respectfully submitted

  2. I think this is one of the most significant information for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The website style is wonderful, the articles is really excellent :
    D. Good job, cheers

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s