Judge Threatens Local HSUS Pres with Contempt, Jail



After a hearing re PC 597.1, California, a hearing officer apparently found a Lincoln CA horse owner was able to get his animals back. As we have stated many times, most owners never get their animals back due to either not being able to pay the storage costs, or the hearing officer finding that the owner or caretaker did not make the cut. Although either ASPCA or HSUS or their cronies had proposed changed CA law that IF a warrant was used, then NO seizure hearing would be given, that proposed law [that particular section anyway] did not pass. However, several other portions of the law did pass.  http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_1451-1500/sb_1500_cfa_20120416_122202_sen_comm.html



We also just heard from a CA pro se client who is challenging his PC597.1 seizure, where his dogs were to be returned but there was a huge debacle over not returning the dogs, and THEN defendants allowing TWO litters of pups to be born IN the shelter, and THEN Judge (criminal case judge) tells the city attorney, she doesn’t have much of a chance to push PC597.1(k) on this owner PRIOR to the criminal case?  Pro se client dismissed his PD (public defender) and was appointed street counsel (used in conflict cases.)  We will update and hope this case proves to be viable.




“On Thursday, a hearing officer found the animals “were not justifiably seized,” and ordered them returned immediately.

But the Humane Society of the Sierra Foothills told KCRA 3 the group is not giving the horses back.    “They’re at a secret location,” Rosemary Frieborn said. (This is not the HSUS of the USA directly but apparently most humane societies in CA follow the way the HSUS writes state laws, and are rabid on seizing everything they can…)

According to court documents, on Wednesday morning, Placer County Superior Court Commissioner Michael Jacques placed Marilyn Jasper, the Humane Society president, under oath and ordered her to reveal where the horses were being kept.

When Jasper refused, Jacques indicated he was prepared to charge her with contempt of court.

Read more: http://www.kcra.com/news/humane-society-returns-horses-seized-from-lincoln-ranch/-/11797728/23839208/-/120bs6bz/-/index.html#ixzz2pxnSZJmP

Frieborn is the humane officer who seized the animals last month under court order. She told KCRA 3 her group is hiding the animals because they’re likely to appeal the case in Superior Court.

When asked if she felt justified in seizing the animals, she said, “Oh absolutely justified, yes. Those animals needed to get out of there.”

But hearing officer Jo McCormack did not agree. She ruled, “The Society lacked reasonable grounds to believe the immediate seizure of the animals was required to protect their health and safety.”

“I always thought I was going to get them back,” Carpenter said.

Under the ruling, the Humane Society of the Sierra Foothills must now pay all the costs of caring for and treating the animals seized from Carpenter’s ranch. This group also hired Bruce Wagman AR animal attorney to appeal the finding.

Read more: http://www.kcra.com/news/lincoln-rancher-wins-battle-to-get-horses-back/-/11797728/22881604/-/fwobgcz/-/index.html#ixzz2pxmSHTce

5 thoughts on “Judge Threatens Local HSUS Pres with Contempt, Jail

  1. Now sue everyone involved with the seizure, maintenance of the horses and those who assisted in hiding the horses, for money damages and expose their network to the public. It is the only way these arrogant, affluent, lawless, spoiled brat officious intermeddlers will learn that they are not above the law.

  2. Pingback: Judge Orders THE ANIMALS RETURNED to Their Rightful Owners | Top Cats Roar...

  3. Good, let us know when the Cavalry Group gets a win. Criminal defense attorneys coupled with those who know AR tactics is a must. The CA Penal Code should be changed to NOT seize animals which are NOT harmed. Not only would that save on fees, it saves on storage.
    ARs simply copied the child welfare laws. It needs to be changed.

  4. HSUS is not named directly. That doesn’t mean they
    did not get involved. They usually insert themselves into
    any seizure involving horses or large numbers of animals if possible. They inserted themselves into the APHIS lawsuit by filing an intervention. No surprise.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s