Join the Crusade Against HSUS+Pass It Forward—>
We have news for animal rescuers and shelters and those who want to save homeless pets. HSUS isn’t about saving THEM. HSUS tells shelters to kill animals 72 hr. after they come into the shelter.
HSUS THINKS ALL OF US ARE STUPID. THAT WE BELIEVE WHATEVER HSUS TELLS US.
You heard me right. The “shelter” dogs/cats etc, are really a big ploy, a ruse….. HSUS sacrifices those animals so HSUS can make it look like they REALLY, REALLY CARE ABOUT PETS… but they don’t do much in the saving of pets, actually HSUS wants NO animals owned. However, HSUS brags that they save dogs via their dog raids (pitbulls and mills) and in disasters. All of which are HUGE media marketing, promotional exhibitions for HSUS TV, news videos,websites.
SO—-groups like HSUS purposely PREY on the EMOTIONS OF THOSE who actually feel sorry for shelter animals and those without homes. They get the emotional people to DONATE TO HSUS, making them believe (misleading them actually) that HSUS really tries to save dogs and cats.
NO, NO, NO–what HSUS does– is to tell everyone NOT to BUY a dog. NOT TO BUY A DOG. HSUS joins with Best Friends and says “Don’t Buy a Puppy!” Yet very few purchased dogs of any value (and I mean $600-$5,000) are ever put into shelters. And since PETSTORE dogs are only about 2% of all OWNED dogs, they comprise almost 0% of shelter dogs.
SO WHY DOES HSUS FOCUS ON PETSTORES? For one thing, they are an easier TARGET…
BECAUSE HSUS WANTS NO ANIMALS SOLD, BOUGHT OR OWNED. THAT’S WHY. IT’S CALLED ANIMAL RIGHTS- JUST LIKE PETA AND ALL THE REST.
THINK! THINK THINK ! THINK THINK THINK!
Instead of helping educate poor people, or those less fortunate, HSUS instead simply says MANDATED ALTERING FOR ALL PETS. And that’s supposed to be what? Compassion? No, that’s what a Communist country does to its people.
HSUS is wrecking shelter (documented) progress by forcing MSN on cities that are doing ok without it–and bankrupting the cities that are buying into the forced MSN idea. Further, HSUS’ laws are causing economic damage and misleading the public as to pet businesses, pet owners, and even shelters and rescue groups, not to mention the ENTIRE PET TRADE OVERALL.
Has the economy gotten so bad that HSUS “can’t afford” or is restrained by monetary constraints? Not hardly. YET WHEN THE GROUP BAD RAP ASKED HSUS IF THEY WOULD HELP OUT WITH RESCUING SOME DOGS IN OAKLAHOMA—HSUS SAID NO. NO. NO. NO it’s the economy.
Let’s look at a very small sample….
Let’s be serious. If you had millions and you (HSUS) REALLY wanted to help save animals, would you start taking donations of millions of $$ and then somehow your balance sheet is wrong and millions are not accounted for? Katrina pets? Complaints??
HSUS had over $8,000,000 to spend on ONE political campaign in California re restraints on egg laying chickens. $8,000,000.
HSUS has bragged (yes, bragged) that they are the biggest, largest, best animal protection group in the USA, or in the world….. Let’s talk about what protection means?
To HSUS, protection means protection of ANIMALS FROM PEOPLE owning them, or using animal products, or farming. It does NOT mean helping save homeless pets, homeless dogs or cats. It does not mean no kill, even if HSUS says it does. When HSUS does media talk, it always has an ulterior motive in their favor. That’s the only reason they do it.
HSUS’ so called help is stuff like prohibiting exotic pets, banning cockfighting,horse slaughter,internet hunting, greyhound racing,confinement of chickens.—–> None of these things helps shelters, rescues, pet owners, pets, or anything related to pets. <———
HSUS is not the PET OWNER’S FRIEND. Not even the PET’s friend. It is documented that HSUS, when asked for advice in a Las Vegas shelter, in 2007, where 1,000 animals allegedly were killed, HSUS said to kill all animals 72hr after they came INTO the shelter. That was the advice of the “saving” animals group HSUS. Kill ’em faster. Give’em 72hours and kill, kill, kill.
It is Wayne P’s personal view that animals should be left alone, meaning not owned by humans, not used by humans, not pets for humans. WP has said, on more than several occasions, animals should just be left alone. Now that doesn’t exactly sound like the voice of someone who loves pets. WP has no pets. His girlfriend has a cat or 2, but not him.
Check this out, below, from earlier in August 2008………..I had also read the story last year, but all I could find of it right now, was this, when someone commented on WP and his obvious non-interaction with animals. WP has admitted he might pet an animal, but he does not feel anything between himself and the animal. I read that when they interviewed WP re the horses at Black Beauty.
“For years, Pacelle did not even have a pet. But when Gutleben moved in with him, she brought along her cat, Libby.
“He’s interesting with animals,” said Gutleben, 30. “He doesn’t want to bother them or invade their space. He’s like ‘Hello, Libby.’ ” She imitated a formal, masculine voice, then laughed. “I just want to swoop her up and bury my head in her fur. He just lets her be. So, of course, she just crawls on the counters and he lets her crawl up and sit on his chest. If he needs to work, he’ll ask me to remove her.”
read this carefully..” He asks his live in to “REMOVE HER”..when her cat sits on Wayne.. now there is a guy who LOVES animals.. I won’t even comment on his personal relationship.. that would take a couch and at least a couple of years.”